www.supervideo.com
My MX
New NV-MX7000 / NV-MX?00 PAL 
                                 Japan     /    Missing In Action                     


MX Directory
HERE

World's First 3CCD mini DV cam:   
 Still resolution UXGA (2048 X 1498)
Anamorphic OR 16X9 wide screen 

Look carefully down the lens barrel of the MX
& you'll notice that 16X9 is now native!   


Is This Up Close and Personal Enough?

     Bluetooth, S-Video, FireWire & Light 
  Flash Memory SD to    1 Giga Byte!


Exclusive Accessories:
    1- meister's Crystal Clear U/W Housing
2- All Day & Night tiny waist battery 
3- Matching Leica Pana MX W/A     
  

1               2             3

Image will Beat (BEAT!) TRV950,
PDX10, Canon GL-2,  XL-1s and
JVC Streamcorder 300Y


Because Glass Leica Optics

  
Side by Side image comparisons here...


MX7000 Black Mamba & MX6000

More Details and Specs and
Prices Here Soon also...

Prism Block is

Kauai Shootout Extracts
 
    Why is the MX so sharp in image 
    resolution Mr. meister?

That apparently has a lot to do with the combination of 3
features working in tandem. The Leica lens groups with 
the Pana Prism Block and the 3 Mega Pixel CCD's where       
most camcorders are lucky just to have 1 Mega Pixel or 1.5  
Mega Pixel count CCD.  My 1.55 Mega Pixel Sony TRV50     
was blown away by the quality of the MX at the wedding.    
Ed Kaimoluku

         Just how good was the OIS? 
The image stabilization is of a still newer Pana generation and 
does compare favorably with my GL-2 in handling qualities. 
Bob Vali

     Isn't the DVX still a better cam?
There is no doubt the AG-DVX100 is a superior cam... but
hands on both the MX and the 24p... I Also would NOT bring 
the MX to the states to sit on a dealer's shelf next    
to a far more expensive DVX as the bottom line image     
quality difference does not justify the price difference.        
Linda Jean

 Was the cam's small size an issue?
My XL1s performed flawlessly and it still looks like a 
professional piece of machinery to lug around this 
sort of exotic wedding. Problem was the bride and   
later at the reception the attendees seemed more            
impressed with the same scenes on the MX monitor,  
sad to say. Hands down I would prefer a match set   
of 2 MX's any day to one XL and still have some  
left over change... it was that simple!   Douglas Lee   

   Did the Sony users have an opinion?  
Sony may not like me saying this but if my TRV950 
cost only half, around $1,000 and the MX was triple,
to around $3,000... the MX would still be a steal.  The
MX could out performed camcorders costing over        
five grand and that says something to it's 
competitiveness.  'Chick'  Henry

     
   Where was JVC in all this?
The Streamcorder is a great cam to have at this sort
of exotic wedding location and since I spent so much
of my own money for it... I have to say that JVC is going    
to have to reduce the price or at least the street price as 
even the TRV950 at $2199 looked as good in color 
saturation and may have done better in low light indoor
shots.  The XL1s was better under lights and the DVX
beat everybody including the MX when it was in 24p.
I also think JVC needs to improve the digital audio or 
at least let us know we need a good external mic.
Dave Goddard 

       What's was the Bad News?
We did NOT have a source in the states for this MX...
Now...
I have about 11 sources in the US & in Canada for 
a complete MX camcorder with 'KIT'
Two of these sources said if you would order the 
Owner's Manual they will give you the MX for
FREE

              more ASAP...
These comments above will be posted in their entirety
once I get back stateside and get caught up with some
much needed sleep and answer a few thousand e-mails! 
Thanks... Aloha



MX DIRECTORY